It'd be too easy if I gave my reason away that fast, wouldn't it?
In any case, you gave me your honest opinion without any context, so I'll give it to you now.
The first was associated with calling all of us paranoid. The second referred to how an ambiguous "something" happened and everything caught on fire before the previous group died. Would that make your analysis change, or stay the same?
no subject
It'd be too easy if I gave my reason away that fast, wouldn't it?
In any case, you gave me your honest opinion without any context, so I'll give it to you now.
The first was associated with calling all of us paranoid. The second referred to how an ambiguous "something" happened and everything caught on fire before the previous group died. Would that make your analysis change, or stay the same?